Naa Bohugu Mahami Abdulai Sherigah II
The King of the Mamprugu Traditional Area who doubles as the President of the North East Regional House of Chiefs, Naa Bohugu Mahami Abdulai Sherigah II, has categorically rejected the Bawku chieftaincy mediation report of the Asantehene, Otumfuo Osei Tutu II in its entirety.
According to the Nayiri, the report and recommendation does not reflect his engagements with Otumfuo, nor those of his duly constituted mediation team.
“I therefore formally reject the report and recommendations in its entirety,” the King of Mamprugu disclosed in a press release issued yesterday following the presentation of the report to President John Mahama by Otumfuo.
“I, the Nayiri, Overlord of Mamprugu, wish to formally and unequivocally distance the office of the Nayiri and the people of Mamprugu from the so-called mediation report presented by Otumfuo Osei Tutu II in respect of the Bawku Chieftaincy Dispute.
“I have taken note, with profound disappointment and grave concern, the presentation described as a ‘report and recommendations’ by Otumfuo to His Excellency, the President of the Republic of Ghana, John Dramani Mahama, on December 16, 2025.
“I must state clearly and without reservation that the so-called report and recommendations does not reflect my engagements with Otumfuo, nor those of my duly constituted mediation team,” parts of the release stated.
The Asantehene, during the report presentation, announced that Asigri Abugrago Azoka, Bawku Naba and Paramount Chief of the Kusasi Traditional Area is the lawfully recognised chief.
Otumfuo recommended that Seidu Abagre, should be recalled by the Nayiri and reassigned to perform a different traditional role at the Palace of the Nayiri in Nalerigu, but if he wishes to stay in Bawku, then he will have to stay there as a private citizen.
A statement signed by the King of Mamprugu disclosed that the purported report and recommendations in question does not constitute a valid mediation, and any attempt to present it as binding or to seek government enforcement is legally untenable, procedurally flawed, and constitutionally impermissible.
“Otumfuo expressly described his role as that of a mediator and not an arbitrator. Notwithstanding this, the document purports to pass judgment and to prescribe measures for enforcement – acts wholly inconsistent with the nature, limits, and essence of mediation.
“Despite repeated and formal requests by my mediation team, no Terms of Reference were ever provided to govern the mediation process, contrary to the expectations that both the former President, Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, and the current President, John Dramani Mahama would have clearly indicated what these terms of reference were,” the statement said.
The statement further noted that at no point were the parties invited to engage with, comment on, or respond to the conclusions said to have been reached, and that if any deliberations occurred, they were conducted entirely without the knowledge, participation, or consent of Mamprugu.
“A mediation report, properly so called, must faithfully reflect the positions advanced by the parties, identify areas of agreement and disagreement, and record any consensual outcomes achieved through facilitated dialogue. It cannot lawfully or legitimately substitute the mediator’s personal opinions, recommendations, or decisions for the negotiated positions of the parties. To do so is to abandon mediation and to assume an adjudicative role for which no jurisdiction exists. The recommendations contained in that report, therefore, amount to a unilateral determination imposed without due process, in clear violation of the ‘audi alteram partem’ principle and the foundational rules of natural justice,” the Nayiri stressed.
“I am further constrained to ask whether the established principles of mediation have now been altered to permit a mediator to ground recommendations on selective reliance on committee reports and court decisions, rather than on the promised traditional, consultative, and facilitative approach.
“The report is replete with factual inaccuracies, personal assertions attributed to the mediator, and a manifest imbalance in favour of one party’s narrative, while almost entirely omitting Mamprugu’s case. For the avoidance of doubt, it is entirely false to suggest that I ever agreed to the continued recognition of Aninchema as Bawku Naba,” the Nyiri stated.
He added that it is equally disturbing that both parties to the mediation were absent at the presentation of the report, which is now being portrayed as having enjoyed their acceptance.
“One must reasonably ask why duly mandated representatives of the parties were denied the opportunity to comment – an opportunity that could have lent legitimacy to any claimed endorsement while other organisations were selectively invited instead. To say that I feel betrayed, disappointed, and deeply hurt would be a grave understatement,” he stated.
Govt Response
The Nayiri further expressed his disappointment about government’s intention to issue a statement within 24 hours after Otumfuo presented the mediation report.
“Such an approach, respectfully, will not advance the peace we all seek. I urge the President to engage fully with all parties and with the mediator before taking any action founded upon this deeply flawed document. The contents of the report appear calculated to cast Mamprugu in an unjust and unfavourable light, notwithstanding our consistent good faith and commitment to peace.
“I will not remain passive in the face of what appears to be a carefully orchestrated process, conceived long before the commencement of mediation, and designed to prejudice Mamprugu,” he revealed.
The King of Mamprugu, categorically stated that not an inch of Mamprugu’s ancestral heritage will be ceded to anyone.
“Not even an inch of Mamprugu’s ancestral heritage will be ceded to anyone, especially through an unjust and clearly orchestrated process. I stress that this so-called mediation ended in a clear deadlock, with no consensus reached between the parties. The Mamprugu side made concessions in good faith at the request of Otumfuo, concessions which were later acknowledged and praised by President John Dramani Mahama.
“These were nevertheless rejected outright by the Kusasi side, without any attempt to move toward the middle ground that mediation demands. It was therefore my reasonable expectation that any mediation report would remain within the limits prescribed by the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2010 (Act 795), by reporting the deadlock rather than purporting to reach final determinations or legal conclusions – especially where law was never argued, and where the mediator is neither judge nor arbitrator,” he said.
Call For Calm
The Nayiri, however, entreated all within Mamprugu to continue to remain calm and law-abiding.
“As I have always maintained, I stand firmly for peace and shall continue to pursue that path. However, peace cannot and will not be built upon injustice. I entreat all within Mamprugu to continue to remain calm and law-abiding. I remain fully committed to peace, dialogue, and stability in Bawku and the wider Mamprugu area. However, peace must be founded on law, history, fairness, and consent, not on imposed outcomes or procedurally defective processes.
“Any sustainable resolution of the Bawku Chieftaincy Dispute must proceed through a transparent and impartial process that respects the historical foundations of Mamprugu as a whole, constitutional norms, and the dignity of all traditional authorities,” the Nayiri emphasised.
From Eric Kombat, Tamale