Sedinam Christine Tamakloe-Attionu
A former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Microfinance & Small Loans Centre (MASLOC), Sedinam Christine Tamakloe-Attionu, and the former Operations Manager of MASLOC, Daniel Axim, have been charged by the state with 80 counts of stealing, causing financial loss to the state, causing loss to public property, improper payment of public funds, unauthorised commitment resulting in financial obligation for the government, money laundering and contravention of the Public Procurement Act.
The first accused person, Mrs. Tamakloe-Attionu, was the CEO of MASLOC from November 2013 to January 2017. The second accused person, Mr. Axim, is the former Operations Manager at MASLOC. MASLOC is a government agency set up to assist small and medium scale businesses with low interest loans.
The Facts of the Case
According to the brief facts as contained in the charge sheet filed at the Registry of the Criminal Division of the High Court in Accra in 2017, the Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO) conducted investigations into certain fraudulent disbursement of MASLOC funds involving the first and second accused persons.
The
investigations, the state says, revealed that in June 2014, MASLOC invested a
sum of GH¢150,000 in Obaatanpa Microfinance Company Limited (Obaatanpa), a
licenced Tier II microfinance company located at Ejura in the Ashanti Region.
Thereafter, the first accused person offered Obaatanpa a further investment sum
of GH¢500,000. As a result, a MASLOC Agricultural Development Bank (ADB) cheque
dated July 24, 2014, in the sum of GH¢500,000 was drawn in favour of Obaatanpa.
Soon after Obaatanpa received the MASLOC cheque, the first accused person
informed the board chairman of Obaatanpa that the investment amount of
GH¢500,000 would attract 24 per cent interest. Obaatanpa decided to return the
amount to MASLOC since the interest rate being demanded by the accused person
was too high and unprofitable for its business and issued a cheque in refund of
the loan amount.
The facts further state that upon presentation of the cheque, the first accused person declined to accept the cheque and made a demand for a cash refund. A cash amount of GH¢500,000 was delivered to the first accused person by the board chairman of Obaatanpa on the night of August 28, 2014, at the Baatsona Total Filling Station located on the Spintex Road in Accra. By a letter dated August 28, 2014, the first accused person acknowledged receipt of the refund sum.
In 2015, per letters, some of which were under the hand of the accused person, MASLOC made demands on Obaatanpa for the payment of interest on the principal investment sum of GH¢500,000. In response to the demands, Obaatanpa wrote a reminder to MASLOC concerning the payment of the loan amount and drew the first accused person’s attention to the unjustified demands, whereupon the demands stopped. In 2017, upon the assumption of office of a new Chief Executive of MASLOC, a demand notice was again sent to Obaatanpa for the payment of accrued interest on the same investment sum of GH¢500,000, whereupon Obaatanpa once again informed MASLOC that the said money had already been refunded since 2014. Investigations subsequently showed that MASLOC had no record of the amount having been paid to it and that the first accused person had appropriated the amount of GH¢500,000.
Investigations further revealed that in April 2016, the first accused person obtained approval of the MASLOC board to utilize the sum of GH¢1,706,000 of MASLOC funds for a countrywide sensitisation and monitoring programme for 85,300 beneficiaries of MASLOC loans. Each of the targeted 85,300 beneficiaries was to receive GH¢20 to cover transportation and refreshment. Between April and December 2016, upon the authority of the first accused person, a total sum of GH¢1,816,000 withdrawn in tranches was received by the first and second accused persons even though approval had been given by the MASLOC board for a sum of GH¢1,706,000. Again, investigations revealed that out of the sum of GH¢1,816,000 only GH¢1,300 was spent on refreshment for some beneficiaries in the Volta, Greater-Accra and Brong-Ahafo Regions only, and that no programme whatsoever took place in the other seven regions.
The state, in her brief facts, further disclosed that investigations further revealed that prior to the board’s approval, the first accused person also appropriated GH¢246,280 meant for training, sensitization and financial literacy. The investigations, the state says, disclosed that in 2013, following a fire disaster at the Kantamanto market, the then President John Mahama directed MASLOC to provide an assistance of GH¢1,465,035 to victims of the fire disaster. The money was, however, to be disbursed through Dwadifo Adamfo Savings & Loans Company Limited (Dwadifo Adamfo). The state enquiries, it says, showed that the first accused person appropriated GH¢579,800 out of the sum of GH¢1,465,035.
In August 2016, the first accused person on behalf of MASLOC wrote to the Public Procurement Authority (PPA) for approval to procure vehicles from Mac Autos and Spare Parts Limited (Mac Autos) for the GPRTU using the single source method under the Public Procurement Act. In October 2016, the PPA wrote back to MASLOC requesting MASLOC to furnish it with financial arrangement approved by the Ministry of Finance. On December 5, 2016, the then Minister of Finance wrote to the PPA to confirm financial arrangements which were being put in place for the purchase of vehicles. Without any approval from PPA, the first accused person signed a contract with Mac Autos on December 6, 2016, to supply MASLOC with 350 vehicles comprising 150 Chevy Aveo Saloon, 100 Chevy Sparklite and 33-seater Isuzu buses. MASLOC applied for a tax waiver on all the vehicles.
The unit price offered by Mac Autos to MASLOC for the Chevy Aveo was GH¢74,495 ($18,883.39). However, investigations revealed that the actual retail price Mac offered for the same model within the same year without duty was GH¢47,346.93 ($12,009.91). The unit price offered for the Chevy Sparklite was GH¢ 65,095.00 ($16,500.63) when the actual price offered by Mac Autos within that same period without duty was GH¢35,918.37 ($9,104.77). For the Isuzu 33-seater buses the unit price offered to MASLOC was GH¢445,560 ($112,942.96) but the actual retail price without duty was GH¢293,877.55 ($74,493.67).
Again, in November 2016, MASLOC procured 200 pieces of Samsung B310 mobile dual sim phones under a project called PINCO Project Market Survey. Investigations revealed that although the actual open market price of the phones was GH¢24,400, the first accused person purchased them at the inflated price of GH¢93,412. Additional checks also revealed that in January 2017, the first accused person, without the requisite approval and authorisation, caused to be paid to herself and her deputy, one Mustapha Abubakar Batalima, the sums of GH¢135,592.33 and GH¢82,218.76 respectively as ex gratia. Furthermore, in the same month, the first accused person caused to be paid to herself and her deputy cash payments in the sums of GH¢28,445.94 and GH¢27,486.62 respectively, purportedly in lieu of leave, in contravention of the law.
The Charges
Count one to 35 are on charges of stealing and conspiracy to commit crime namely stealing contrary to Section 23(1) and 124(1) of the Criminal Offences Act 1960 (Act 29). Count 36 to 68 are on causing financial loss to the state, wilfully causing financial to the state and conspiracy to commit crime, namely wilfully causing financial to the state, all of which are contrary to Section 23(1) and 179A (3)(a) of the Criminal Offences Act 1960 (Act 29). Counts 70 and 71 border on causing loss to public property, contrary to Section 2 of the Public Property Protection Act 1977 (SMCD 140).
Furthermore, counts 72 and 73 have the statement of offence captured as improper payment of public funds contrary to Section 96(1)(c) of the Public Financial Management Act, 2016 (Act 921). Count 74 charges Mrs. Tamakloe-Attionu with unauthorised commitment, resulting in financial obligation for the government contrary to Section 96(1)(a) of the Public Financial Management Act, 2016 (Act 921). Count 75 to 78 prefer charges of money laundering contrary to Section 1(1)(c) of Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2008 (Act 749) and finally count 79 and 80 border on the charge of contravention of the Public Procurement Act contrary to Section 92(1) and 40(1)(a) of the Public Procurement Act, 2003 (Act 663).
First Court Sitting
Barring any changes, the accused persons are expected to be arraigned for their charges to be read to them and for their plea to be taken on Monday, February 4, 2019.
–Starrfmonline